Well I got through the whole thing but it was hard to comprehend with the kids buzzing around. I think it sounds like a good solid theory. I actually really like it. My only problem with it is how would they explain it through the television show? I think they would have a hard time explaining it to the common man. And the other question is if they are in the past (1996) then Charlie who is alive in 2004 should really still be alive like Ben is still alive because he makes it to 2007. So bring back Charlie and Echo and I will be happy again. I do really like this theory. Since it is so good I may have a hard time keeping it seperate from the real show.
2 comments:
This will give you a headache too, if you bother to read the whole thing. But I did think some of it was interesting and explained a lot. Who knows?
Well I got through the whole thing but it was hard to comprehend with the kids buzzing around. I think it sounds like a good solid theory. I actually really like it. My only problem with it is how would they explain it through the television show? I think they would have a hard time explaining it to the common man. And the other question is if they are in the past (1996) then Charlie who is alive in 2004 should really still be alive like Ben is still alive because he makes it to 2007. So bring back Charlie and Echo and I will be happy again. I do really like this theory. Since it is so good I may have a hard time keeping it seperate from the real show.
Post a Comment